A survey of countries that enforce the death penalty for drug offences reveals that in many nations the majority or even entirety of those facing execution are foreigners.
release: Thursday September 15, 2011 (London, UK)
In a follow-up to its landmark survey on the death penalty for drug offences, Harm Reduction International reveals that in many of the 32 nations or territories that have capital drug laws in force, the vast majority of those executed or facing death are from abroad. [SEE APPENDIX]
hundreds, if not thousands, of non-nationals who are facing or have faced the death penalty for drugs in recent years including citizens of Australia, France, Israel, Liberia, Mexico, Mongolia, The Netherlands, Nepal, Nigeria, Peru, The Philippines, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, Zambia and many more.
'This report should encourage
governments to reflect on their counter-narcotics assistance to states which continue to sentence people to death for drug offences,' said Rick Lines, executive director of Harm Reduction International.
'No government in the world can
say with absolute confidence that these laws won't potentially lead to a death sentence for one of its own citizens.
would not impose at home, we should not expose people to abroad.'
In its report, The Death Penalty for Drug Offences – Global Overview 2011:
Shared Responsibility and Shared Consequences’, Harm Reduction International reveals that there were hundreds of executions for drug offences in the past year. Moreover, the organisation estimates that the number of people executed for drugs every year likely surpasses a thousand when states that keep their death penalty figures a secret are included.
These executions are carried out in direct violation of international law that
limits the legal application of capital punishment. UN human rights monitors have also expressed their concern about the number of foreigners represented on death row.
Many governments claim to retain the death penalty primarily for drug offences as a means of deterring trafficking and drug use in their countries. There is, however, no credible evidence that the death penalty for drugs is an effective deterrent.
'Drug policies must respect human rights, international standards and proven public health measures to be effective,’ said Lines ‘It is simply wrong for a
government to try and kill its way out of a drug problem. These killings are arbitrary and morally repugnant.'
Gallahue, a human rights analyst for Harm Reduction International and researcher on the report said, ‘These incidents demonstrate the need for international standards to be respected when governments work together to address transnational issues.’
Key findings of the report:
* There are likely to be more than a thousand people executed every year for a drug offence and in many environments the majority or even totality are non-nationals of the executing state.
* There are hundreds, if not thousands, of non-nationals who are facing or have faced the death penalty for drugs in recent years including citizens of Australia, France, Israel, Liberia, Mexico, Mongolia, The Netherlands, Nepal, Nigeria, Peru, The Philippines, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, Zambia and many more.
* Indonesia: Past reports indicate that about half of the estimated one-hundred people on Indonesia’s death row are drug offenders and that 80 percent of those are foreign, including citizens Australia, the Netherlands and the United States. In 2009, the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions wrote: “While it seems clear that foreigners play a significant role in smuggling drugs into Indonesia, the fact that four out of five prisoners awaiting execution on drugs trafficking charges are foreigners raises certain questions in terms of possible discrimination in relation to both criminal enforcement and sentencing in drug-related cases.” In 2008, two Nigerians imprisoned for drug trafficking in an EU-US funded supermax prison in the country were executed by firing squad having been given one day’s notice of their deaths.
* Saudi Arabia: Harm Reduction International estimates that 53 of the 62
executions for drugs identified in 2007 and 2008 were of foreign nationals.
* Singapore: The government ofSingapore has executed at least five peoople for drugs since 2008. In the past decade the government has executed citizens of Australia and Nigeria.
* Kuwait: There have been at least 14 executions for drug offences since 1998 – and it is believed that the overwhelming majority, if not the entirety, were from abroad.
* Iran: Of the 650-plus people executed in Iran in 2010, 590 were drug offenders, according to a report published by the UK’s Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
* China: Credible reports indicate that in the week leading up to 26 June 2010, the UN International Day Against Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking, China executed at least fifty-nine people, including 20 in a single day
The lawful application of capital punishment is significantly restricted under international law. Article 6
(2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights states that the penalty of death may only be applied to the ‘most serious crimes’. Over the past twenty-five years UN human rights bodies have interpreted Article 6(2) in a manner that limits the number and type of offences for which execution is allowable under international human rights law.
While many retentionist governments argue that drug offences fall under the umbrella of ‘most serious crimes’, this is not the perspective of the UN Human Rights Committee or the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or
arbitrary executions, both of which have stated that drug offences do not constitute ‘most serious crimes’ and that executions for such offences are therefore in violation of international human rights law. This is supported by
international State practice given the small minority of countries retaining capital punishment for drugs. In recent years there has also been increasing support for the belief that capital punishment in any form violates the
prohibition of cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment, as enshrined in numerous UN and regional human rights treaties, and customary international law.
To view the full report please  click here.
Further information please contact:
Patrick Gallahue, Human Rights Analyst and author of the report
Mobile: +44 (0) 79 8890 9005
Harm Reduction International is a leading non-governmental organisation working to promote and expand support for harm reduction worldwide. We work to reduce the negative health, social and human rights impacts of drug use and drug policy – such as the increased vulnerability to HIV and hepatitis infection among people who inject drugs – by promoting evidence-based public health policies and practices, and human rights based approaches to drug policy.